QCF Design Community

The problem is that then you'll need to have the agnostics collar to desecrate if we keep pumping them.

I'm really interested in the Pactmaker, and they really need to improve on his pacts. (-1% damage per spell, what a scam!!!!!!).

Be warned, you cannot convert from this version of the Pactmaker. All piety gain comes from pacts only. If they implement this, they need to pump most of the pacts.

I suggest making him/her a worshipable god in addition to forcing a pact upon worship...

Comitment: For every 20 piety gained by your pact, The Pactmaker shall bless you by granting a random bonus (patches effects). 30 piety. Those who serve longer are rewarded.

A Change of Heart: Change your pact at the cost of a random penalty (patches effects). 10 piety, repeatable. Under certain circumstances, The Pactmaker can be persuaded.

Eternal Binding: Take another pact. Free, repeatable. Committing yourself further could be beneficial...

Permanance: Gain 4 hp per level. Your choice to stay with The Pactmaker is reflected in your staying power in battles to come. 100 piety.

Power: Gain +2 fireball damage per level. Your true commitment has pleased The Pactmaker so much, The Pactmaker has blessed you with its own power. 100 piety.

Thanks if you read this!

I like the idea that pactmaker is a support god, but I'd just like to see some of his pacts reworked.

Can you desecrate the Pactmaker?

Also, the reason I suggested the above post, the current Pactmaker will always either be too good for gods like GG and ok for Binlor or terrible for Binlor and ok for GG.

(GG and Binlor are just 2 examples. One stingy, the other not)

That's true, I was just wondering.

So what do you propose they do? Change the Pactmaker or the others.

Also, unless the Pactmaker becomes a real god, you should always have a 50 or so percent chance of getting the altar in addition to the other 3.

reworking alot of things and adding in demi gods to the piety system sounds like a very interesting idea.

Cool idea! What would the other ones be????

That's very true Darvin...