[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 120: preg_filter(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 120: preg_filter(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 120: preg_filter(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
QCF Design Community • View topic - Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA


Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

All things Desktop Dungeons

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby Darvin on Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:40 pm

User avatar
Darvin
 
Posts: 4355
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:44 am

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby Abraxas on Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:11 am

That sounds much too complex for what is supposed to be a beginner-friendly class (as does, to a lesser extent, the CP on pick-up idea).
That which is not dead may eternal lie, and with strange aeons even death may die.
User avatar
Abraxas
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:59 pm

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby Blovski on Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:52 am

Blovski
 
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:21 pm

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby Wargasm on Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:14 am

Thing is, if you get 2 JJ mana boons, you actually get more mana from the 2 potions you have left than you would have the 4 total. To say nothing of buying a 5th potion, let alone Gnomes. Hence why Mystara's boon is terrible by comparison. I admitted in the post the MB is viable once in awhile (basically CYDSTEPP and APHEELSIK), but since CYDSTEPP spamming is limited to one class and only a few classes benefit from using APHEELSIK vs. having more inventory space/converting, that's of limited use. Amusingly, if MB gravitated towards 4 instead of 5, it would be IMMENSELY better, since ENDISWAL, WONAFYT, HALPMEH, and IMAWAL would then benefit, BURNDAYRAZ would cost 4, and GETINDARE being 4 would still be affordable, and PISORF wouldn't cost extra. That alone would make me squeal with joy and actually take MB on non-Warlords.

Right now I only use Wizard when I want a Hoarder badge, because I can use a couple of extra spells that way. That's literally the only use for the class to me right now.
Wargasm
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:22 pm

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby q 3 on Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:54 am

As a less drastic change, how about having the Wizard get one or two extra glyphs on the map? Possibly with reduced conversion values, possibly not, depending on how it would interact with the less/more glyph preps. (Maybe also have PISORF as a guaranteed spawn, both to encourage new players to seriously consider using it offensively, and to enable vets to use it without scumming or prepping Binlor.)
q 3
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 5:36 pm

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby Darvin on Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:16 am

Maybe wizard should just start with both PISORF and BURNDAYRAZ in his inventory?
User avatar
Darvin
 
Posts: 4355
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:44 am

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby The Avatar on Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:40 am

On the sorcerer: I was envisioning (spell cost/2)•level. 3 per level with BURNDAYRAZ, and it nullifies the B2P problem.

On the wizard: What about making him a glyph magnet class? Less CP maybe.
We made an expansion and it is awesome. Really, you should check it out, especially if you're looking for some extra challenge.

Download over at ddmod.weebly.com!
User avatar
The Avatar
 
Posts: 4720
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby Nandrew on Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:21 am

Will probably look at sorcerer, considering that lvl1 bosskills are generally a big no-no.

Wizard? Well, maybe. Not what I'd call game-shattering right now, and certainly not something that we'd consider radically altering our game deployment schedule over. O_o

It's like Darvin said, patches and expansions can deal with minor issues like these. It's crashes, showstoppers and design issues that significantly poison large areas of the game that we'd halt progress for.

Not to say that we don't listen to balance feedback anymore, it's just that we kinda do other stuff first.
User avatar
Nandrew
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:59 pm

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby Wargasm on Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:28 am

Wargasm
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:22 pm

Re: Sorcerer's and BLUDTUPOWA

Postby Nandrew on Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:34 am

Hah, I'm not trying to say that it's a problem, really. We obviously don't want to wilfully say "let's ship an inferior game", but I'm starting to think more and more that getting all of the design sorted to satisfaction (in other words, uh, perfection) is a little unrealistic considering our particular situation.

It has been an interesting few years and admittedly I think what's needed most from us right now is a little distance from the project to have a chance at that "big picture" look. Getting a formal release will also bring in a lot of new players and the vocal base for trends and developments will become that much larger. After a bit of time, releasing a hypothetical DLC pack would hopefully improve the game far more effectively than just making repeated, time-consuming tweaks right now.

Done correctly, many games go from good to amazing in the time that follows their release. We want to put our best foot forward on release day, but I think it's also realistic to assume that we could always do better, too. :)

Though I think I'm just rambling now. I reckon I had a point in there somewhere ...
User avatar
Nandrew
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:59 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Desktop Dungeons

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 54 guests