Talk:Alpha:APHEELSIK - Revision history

Zaratustra: moved Talk:APHEELSIK to Talk:Alpha:APHEELSIK

2011-12-01T19:35:30Z

moved Talk:APHEELSIK to Talk:Alpha:APHEELSIK

Gentlegiant03 at 16:55, 6 December 2010

2010-12-06T16:55:19Z

Headrock at 15:43, 6 December 2010

2010-12-06T15:43:10Z

Gentlegiant03 at 15:39, 6 December 2010

2010-12-06T15:39:44Z

Gentlegiant03 at 15:37, 6 December 2010

2010-12-06T15:37:42Z

Headrock: Created page with 'This is a suggested format for individual Glyph pages. Note that other Glyphs may require slightly different format due to their unique properties, but I think the basic idea sho…'

2010-12-06T00:56:39Z

Created page with 'This is a suggested format for individual Glyph pages. Note that other Glyphs may require slightly different format due to their unique properties, but I think the basic idea sho…'

New page

This is a suggested format for individual Glyph pages. Note that other Glyphs may require slightly different format due to their unique properties, but I think the basic idea should be sound - covering all of the most important angles of each Glyph.

In the meanwhile I haven't actually linked anything to this page yet - pending agreement on the format. Feel free to make edits and see if you can improve where necessary.

Also a nice template would be good right now. Gentlegiant? :)

--[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 00:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *I think it looks pretty good. The issue with glyphs that this seems to address is that they're very situational based in use (requiring an explanation). Looks like a lot of work (much like the Gods pages) so kudos on the contribution... I'd help where I could but sometimes having to work around another person's framework and make corrections can be more time consuming than just doing it yourself. As far as the template, its kind of weak, may or may not need more details (like a section for "Gods perception" or something).--[[User:Gentlegiant03|Gentlegiant03]] 15:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 **I'll leave that up to you, I'm not good with terse things (as you can see :D ). In any case I'll go on and write as many of the other Glyph pages as I can. I guess we can also start linking APHEELSIK wherever it appears... --[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 15:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
-**Oh, and I updated the DDNav template. I see you said you hadn't linked to it yet so feel free to unlink this page from it, the others all point to the glyph overview page, it's getting pretty large in size but not overly so at the moment, needs a hide button (not sure the class is installed on this wiki though).
+**Oh, and I updated the DDNav template. I see you said you hadn't linked to it yet so feel free to unlink this page from it, the others all point to the glyph overview page, it's getting pretty large in size but not overly so at the moment, needs a hide button (not sure the class is installed on this wiki though).--[[User:Gentlegiant03|Gentlegiant03]] 16:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC) (forgot to sign this one D:)
 ***Hmmm, is there anyone who is actually in-charge of this wiki anyway? I mean I see you doing all the maintenance work, which must be a serious bitch with all those bots making accounts, but there doesn't appear to be anyone else to help...

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 6 December 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*I think it looks pretty good. The issue with glyphs that this seems to address is that they're very situational based in use (requiring an explanation). Looks like a lot of work (much like the Gods pages) so kudos on the contribution... I'd help where I could but sometimes having to work around another person's framework and make corrections can be more time consuming than just doing it yourself. As far as the template, its kind of weak, may or may not need more details (like a section for "Gods perception" or something).--[[User:Gentlegiant03\|Gentlegiant03]] 15:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)		*I think it looks pretty good. The issue with glyphs that this seems to address is that they're very situational based in use (requiring an explanation). Looks like a lot of work (much like the Gods pages) so kudos on the contribution... I'd help where I could but sometimes having to work around another person's framework and make corrections can be more time consuming than just doing it yourself. As far as the template, its kind of weak, may or may not need more details (like a section for "Gods perception" or something).--[[User:Gentlegiant03\|Gentlegiant03]] 15:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
		+	**I'll leave that up to you, I'm not good with terse things (as you can see :D ). In any case I'll go on and write as many of the other Glyph pages as I can. I guess we can also start linking APHEELSIK wherever it appears... --[[User:Headrock\|Headrock]] 15:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
	**Oh, and I updated the DDNav template. I see you said you hadn't linked to it yet so feel free to unlink this page from it, the others all point to the glyph overview page, it's getting pretty large in size but not overly so at the moment, needs a hide button (not sure the class is installed on this wiki though).		**Oh, and I updated the DDNav template. I see you said you hadn't linked to it yet so feel free to unlink this page from it, the others all point to the glyph overview page, it's getting pretty large in size but not overly so at the moment, needs a hide button (not sure the class is installed on this wiki though).
		+	***Hmmm, is there anyone who is actually in-charge of this wiki anyway? I mean I see you doing all the maintenance work, which must be a serious bitch with all those bots making accounts, but there doesn't appear to be anyone else to help...

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 6 December 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*I think it looks pretty good. The issue with glyphs that this seems to address is that they're very situational based in use (requiring an explanation). Looks like a lot of work (much like the Gods pages) so kudos on the contribution... I'd help where I could but sometimes having to work around another person's framework and make corrections can be more time consuming than just doing it yourself. As far as the template, its kind of weak, may or may not need more details (like a section for "Gods perception" or something).--[[User:Gentlegiant03\|Gentlegiant03]] 15:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)		*I think it looks pretty good. The issue with glyphs that this seems to address is that they're very situational based in use (requiring an explanation). Looks like a lot of work (much like the Gods pages) so kudos on the contribution... I'd help where I could but sometimes having to work around another person's framework and make corrections can be more time consuming than just doing it yourself. As far as the template, its kind of weak, may or may not need more details (like a section for "Gods perception" or something).--[[User:Gentlegiant03\|Gentlegiant03]] 15:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
		+	**Oh, and I updated the DDNav template. I see you said you hadn't linked to it yet so feel free to unlink this page from it, the others all point to the glyph overview page, it's getting pretty large in size but not overly so at the moment, needs a hide button (not sure the class is installed on this wiki though).

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 6 December 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	--[[User:Headrock\|Headrock]] 00:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Headrock\|Headrock]] 00:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	*I think it looks pretty good. The issue with glyphs that this seems to address is that they're very situational based in use (requiring an explanation). Looks like a lot of work (much like the Gods pages) so kudos on the contribution... I'd help where I could but sometimes having to work around another person's framework and make corrections can be more time consuming than just doing it yourself. As far as the template, its kind of weak, may or may not need more details (like a section for "Gods perception" or something).--[[User:Gentlegiant03\|Gentlegiant03]] 15:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:35, 1 December 2011
(No difference)