Talk:Alpha:BLUDTUPOWA - Revision history

Zaratustra: moved Talk:BLUDTUPOWA to Talk:Alpha:BLUDTUPOWA

2011-12-01T19:46:02Z

moved Talk:BLUDTUPOWA to Talk:Alpha:BLUDTUPOWA

Headrock at 17:04, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T17:04:30Z

Headrock at 17:03, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T17:03:41Z

Gentlegiant03 at 16:53, 13 December 2010

2010-12-13T16:53:01Z

Headrock: Created page with 'Would be a good idea to make a redirect from BLUDTOPOWA in case someone makes this mistake. --~~~~'

2010-12-13T15:53:49Z

Created page with 'Would be a good idea to make a redirect from BLUDTOPOWA in case someone makes this mistake. --~~~~'

New page

Would be a good idea to make a redirect from BLUDTOPOWA in case someone makes this mistake. --[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 15:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Would be a good idea to make a redirect from BLUDTOPOWA in case someone makes this mistake. --[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 15:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 *You know, I thought about this with Bloodmage and it seems that if someone is editing they should preview the edit. If they do that they'll see a red-link in their edit and should look at what the correct article name is and use that instead. The other side of the argument is that it promotes ease of use for what's really important: the end user. With that said I guess a redirect is a good idea...--[[User:Gentlegiant03|Gentlegiant03]] 16:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
-**In a sense you ARE right, when it comes to misspellings. Things like Bloodmage should have redirects because in essence, all the spellings ("Blood Mage", "Bloodmage", "Blood mage") are correct, just one form is cannon. Where there's a misspelling, like BLUDTOPOWA, it's probably better to treat it as such without a redirect, otherwise people will never realize there's a ''correct'' and ''incorrect'' spelling. It took me a while before I even realized I was spelling it badly - and I had made a dozen articles by that point. So bottom line - I agree with you. --[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 17:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
+**In a sense you ARE right, when it comes to misspellings. Things like Bloodmage should have redirects because in essence, all the spellings ("Blood Mage", "Bloodmage", "Blood mage") are correct, but only one specific form is canon. Where there's a misspelling however, like BLUDTOPOWA, it's probably better to treat it as such ''without'' a redirect, otherwise people will never realize there's a ''correct'' and ''incorrect'' spelling. It took me a while before I even realized I was spelling it badly - and I had made a dozen articles by that point. So bottom line - I agree with you. --[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 17:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 13 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Would be a good idea to make a redirect from BLUDTOPOWA in case someone makes this mistake. --[[User:Headrock\|Headrock]] 15:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)		Would be a good idea to make a redirect from BLUDTOPOWA in case someone makes this mistake. --[[User:Headrock\|Headrock]] 15:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
	*You know, I thought about this with Bloodmage and it seems that if someone is editing they should preview the edit. If they do that they'll see a red-link in their edit and should look at what the correct article name is and use that instead. The other side of the argument is that it promotes ease of use for what's really important: the end user. With that said I guess a redirect is a good idea...--[[User:Gentlegiant03\|Gentlegiant03]] 16:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)		*You know, I thought about this with Bloodmage and it seems that if someone is editing they should preview the edit. If they do that they'll see a red-link in their edit and should look at what the correct article name is and use that instead. The other side of the argument is that it promotes ease of use for what's really important: the end user. With that said I guess a redirect is a good idea...--[[User:Gentlegiant03\|Gentlegiant03]] 16:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
		+	**In a sense you ARE right, when it comes to misspellings. Things like Bloodmage should have redirects because in essence, all the spellings ("Blood Mage", "Bloodmage", "Blood mage") are correct, just one form is cannon. Where there's a misspelling, like BLUDTOPOWA, it's probably better to treat it as such without a redirect, otherwise people will never realize there's a ''correct'' and ''incorrect'' spelling. It took me a while before I even realized I was spelling it badly - and I had made a dozen articles by that point. So bottom line - I agree with you. --[[User:Headrock\|Headrock]] 17:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 13 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Would be a good idea to make a redirect from BLUDTOPOWA in case someone makes this mistake. --[[User:Headrock\|Headrock]] 15:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)		Would be a good idea to make a redirect from BLUDTOPOWA in case someone makes this mistake. --[[User:Headrock\|Headrock]] 15:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
		+	*You know, I thought about this with Bloodmage and it seems that if someone is editing they should preview the edit. If they do that they'll see a red-link in their edit and should look at what the correct article name is and use that instead. The other side of the argument is that it promotes ease of use for what's really important: the end user. With that said I guess a redirect is a good idea...--[[User:Gentlegiant03\|Gentlegiant03]] 16:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:46, 1 December 2011
(No difference)