A surprising monster ommission

[Fran]

I think there were some rusalkas in DnD at some point but I could be mistaken. But I'm more puzzled about this:

There is not a single class with a bow or another ranged weapon in the whole game.

I'd say that's even more of a staple

[fall_ark]

[The Avatar]

No, they have 100% (normal) damage.

Skeletons (v. 2.0) should be this: Revives into a weaker (-1 level) or same level (unsure) version of itself, first strike, undead, 120% attack, and 80% hp. Sort of like an undead goblin with revives, but less hp.

[Nandrew]

Lore! Fun!

First came across a Rusalka in Quest For Glory IV. That series always had really cool lore references.

Nice check on the Tokoloshe.

Also, I was really really excitedly thinking that someone would mention a different monster omission while I was loading this thread

[harfatum]

I have to say, I do like the esoteric enemy types. Nothing wrong with goblins or whatever, but it's neat seeing something I haven't encountered elsewhere.

...Nandrew, is it rabbits?

edit: never mind, if rabbits were an enemy, my wife wouldn't play it anymore

[The Avatar]

Basilisks? Wurms? Wolves? Orcs (as a monster)? I probably should know this...

[harfatum]

There's already a lich boss, right? And ogres? I don't recall any ghosts or elementals...

[The Avatar]

Ha! Ogres and liches! There's wraiths.

[Fran]

Bugs, maybe?

15 characters ftw

[Bloggorus]