Wargasm wrote:Well I can't very well prep Binlor if I'm trying to get the Purist badge, and Darvin has repeatedly offered me condescending advice (which has been wrong every single time, to boot) and then decides to throw in he has 19/11 on everything and only VT GT took more than a couple of tries, as if that were somehow relevant. Especially when, as stated, all his advice so far has been wrong (prepping Binlor to get Purist, prepping five potions in the full version and then trying to instruct me on how to count, et cetera.)
Darvin's advice on getting 19/18 - prep binlor - is not condescending, and is correct. Binlor makes that dungeon trivial. If it doesn't apply to getting the purist badge, well, that's no insult to you. Prepping 5 potions - that was changed recently in my memory, and it was popular. My last vid on you tube involves a sidetrack about being able to prep 5 potions is too much. He also wasn't instructing you how to count. Whatever you immagine his slights towards you are, they don't merit your reactions.
Wargasm wrote:I don't take kindly to condescension.
Seeing that every time you make a bombastic claim I go and do a run which disputes it shows that you might just lack perspective, maybe you should get used to the fact that there's simply people who know more then you. If you're incapable of imagining yourself in the position of not having a clue, it's really hard to accept advice that would help you get a clue. And if you're asking for advice, and you are unwilling to accept advice, then you're just going to be an ingrate.
Wargasm wrote: I appreciate what you did, Lujo, don't think I didn't.
No you don't, or at least it's impossible to tell that you in fact understand what I'm talking about. I didn't in fact intend to take the bullet for you, I stepped into a mess you've made, fixed it, but you derailed that mess so hard that the devs were furious and I got all the blame since I wrote some stuff they didn't like to counteract your maniacal and misguided fanboyism in that thread. So they decided it was me who was derailing it and painting the game/them/the community as something which it wasn't - when in fact it was you. I've seen their anger at the idea of someone doing what you did, except you haven't seen it, and should've, otherwise you'd be a lot more manageable right now. So I basicaly tanked a tanker of shit that was headed your direction, because I wanted to help a guy you were haranguing, specifically because I was horrified by you. If I were an angry man, I'd be really pissed off with you right now.
Wargasm wrote: (like doing Purist with Transmuter since you still get five scrolls)
And there you go commiting the vile act of condescending missdirection that should warrant people lambasting you for evil intent and aloof attitude. A bloody typo. You ment to say "Tinker".
Wargasm wrote:where the guy who isn't instigating is going to be the one taking the bullet.
You are incredibly lucky that this kind of moderation can happen anywhere, even here, and that in fact it had happened allready, as I have told you. Otherwise you would've been at least warned in one particular case, but you've since accumulated quite a few good reasons but noone had the heart to interfear. And the forums are generally so nice and well meaning that I guess noone actually ever reports stuff.