Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alpha:Binlor Ironshield"
From DDwiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Well I figured the page should offer things beyond what's already in the [[Gods]] page. Plus the data on the Gods page is formatted in a way that would fit the table, and provide an at-a-glance evaluation of each god against each other god, which is exactly what it does. The individual pages should therefore be a little more in-depth, to give a reason for them to exist. It's not too cluttered though, is it?--[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 22:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | * Well I figured the page should offer things beyond what's already in the [[Gods]] page. Plus the data on the Gods page is formatted in a way that would fit the table, and provide an at-a-glance evaluation of each god against each other god, which is exactly what it does. The individual pages should therefore be a little more in-depth, to give a reason for them to exist. It's not too cluttered though, is it?--[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 22:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
** Doesn't look hateful at all and does a good job expanding on the summary information. Have a little bit going on here or else I'd copy your format and try to make a few more god pages. Maybe tomorrow.--[[User:Gentlegiant03|Gentlegiant03]] 22:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | ** Doesn't look hateful at all and does a good job expanding on the summary information. Have a little bit going on here or else I'd copy your format and try to make a few more god pages. Maybe tomorrow.--[[User:Gentlegiant03|Gentlegiant03]] 22:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | *** I'll see how many gods I can cover tonight. Nothing to do over here :D --[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 22:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:16, 23 November 2010
This format is MUCH better. Not even sure if I should continue creating the other pages? I think you have it.--Gentlegiant03 22:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well I figured the page should offer things beyond what's already in the Gods page. Plus the data on the Gods page is formatted in a way that would fit the table, and provide an at-a-glance evaluation of each god against each other god, which is exactly what it does. The individual pages should therefore be a little more in-depth, to give a reason for them to exist. It's not too cluttered though, is it?--Headrock 22:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Doesn't look hateful at all and does a good job expanding on the summary information. Have a little bit going on here or else I'd copy your format and try to make a few more god pages. Maybe tomorrow.--Gentlegiant03 22:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'll see how many gods I can cover tonight. Nothing to do over here :D --Headrock 22:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Doesn't look hateful at all and does a good job expanding on the summary information. Have a little bit going on here or else I'd copy your format and try to make a few more god pages. Maybe tomorrow.--Gentlegiant03 22:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
